Lee v. United States Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
Judgment was rendered requiring the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company to convey certain real property to plaintiff C. W. Carey upon payment by the latter of the indebtedness found to be due the company from Carey.
The company issued its policy to Carey insuring the dwelling-house on the property against loss by fire in the sum of $2,000. At that time the property was encumbered by a trust deed securing the payment to Charlotte E. Miot of an indebtedness due her from Carey of $2,500. The policy made the loss, if any, payable to Mrs. Miot as her interest might appear and provided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Paez v. Mutual Indemnity Accident, Health & Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Francis v. Iowa National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Knight v. Firemen's InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Kennedy v. ConradMontana Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.