Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Conrad
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1932No. 6,870PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
Plaintiffs, as trustees of the East Chicago Oil Association, brought this action to recover $4,145, alleged to have been furnished by them to defendants. The action was tried to the court without a jury, resulting in judgment for defendants for costs. Plaintiffs appealed from the judgment, and contend that it is contrary to the law and the evidence.
Defendants contend that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, and that, if it does allege sufficient facts, the evidence does not sustain the allegations.
The complaint, in substance, alleges that in July, 1926, defendants were the owners…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Phipps v. FuquaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. v. CallenderMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Inhabitants of Biddeford v. BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Lee v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Roussel v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Liberty National Bank & Trust Company, a National Banking Association v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, a National Banking Association, Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, a National Banking Association, Cross-Appellant v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Company, a National Banking Association, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Nepstad v. East Chicago Oil Assn., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.