Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 2, 1933PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this Court.

Upon its first appearance we reversed the judgment upon writ of error and remanded the issues made for a trial by jury according to law. See Catlett v. Chestnut, 100 Fla. 1146, 131 Sou. Rep. 120. The present writ of error was taken from a directed verdict and final judgment rendered against plaintiff in error as petitioner in the case below when the ease was tried there by jury pursuant to our previous mandate.

In the course of the trial the Circuit Judge was required by the pleadings and the evidence adduced to pass' upon the validity…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Westerman v. Shell's City, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Hanono v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. King v. BrindleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API