Robards v. Cotton Mill Associates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Cotton Mill Associates appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) ordering Cotton Mill to cease and desist from using any application that impermissibly inquires into the nature of a person’s disability or handicap and awarding Gordon Robards civil penal damages and attorney fees. The court (Crowley, J.) had previously granted a partial summary judgment in favor of Robards on the basis that Cotton Mill made illegal inquiries into the nature and extent of his disability and denied Cotton Mill’s motion for a summary judgment on its claim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In Re Guardianship of SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Robards v. Cotton Mill AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- HARTFORD ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CotyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.