HARTFORD ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Coty
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ON STIPULATED RECORD
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
Introduction
The plaintiff, a Canadian company, challenges the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act on federal constitutional and preemption grounds because it applies to Canadian employees who come into Maine for only restricted purposes and limited times. One of the constitutional issues it raises may deserve thoughtful consideration. But the plaintiff filed its complaint in this federal court after the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board started enforcement proceedings against it. Because those state proceedings offer the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MALLINCKRODT LLC v. LittellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. PortlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
- MASSACHUSETTS DELIVERY ASS'N v. CoakleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Porteadores Del Noroeste S.A. De, C.V. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- MAINE FOREST PRODUCTS COUNCIL v. CORMIERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022