Legal Opinion
Robards v. Cotton Mill Associates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 18, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cotton Mill Associates appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Atwood, J.) in favor of Gordon Robards. On appeal Cotton Mill contends that the court erred by finding that a clause in its housing application violated 5 M.R.S.A. § 4582 (Pamph.1997) and granting Robards a summary judgment. Cotton Mill also asserts that the court’s award of attorney fees and civil penal damages to Robards was erroneous. We affirm the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In April 1991 Robards filed a complaint with the Maine Human Rights Commission alleging that Cotton Mill, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas C. Baumgardner v. The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, on Behalf of Blanton B. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Daniels v. Tew Mac Aero Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landis v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- LaFlamme v. New Horizons, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Maine Human Rights Commission v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Adkins v. Atria Senior Living, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2015
- Mariculture v. Under-Lloyds of Lond, No. Cv 98 0163762 S (Jun. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.