Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Owens

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1907No. Civ. No. 243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles E. Naylor, and William P. Hubbard, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Suit brought for an injunction to restrain certain acts complained of by plaintiff. A preliminary injunction was granted upon the verified complaint and an order to show cause why the same should not be made permanent. Defendants interposed a general demurrer to the complaint. On August 23, 1903, the court entered an order- sustaining the demurrer, with leave to plaintiff to amend within ten days. The plaintiff failed to amend within the time allowed, and thereupon judgment was entered in favor of defendants herein. From this judgment plaintiff takes this appeal.

On the 8th of July, 1903, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mechs' Foundry of San Francisco v. RyallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gilbert v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Branch Tpk. Co. v. Bd. Supervisors Yuba Cty.California Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Caifornia Navigation Co. v. Union Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stiles v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Dunker v. the Field and Tule ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Burris v. RodriguesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API