Dunker v. the Field and Tule Club
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order denying a new trial. L. G. Harrier, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to restrain defendant from trespassing upon certain land. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The complaint avers: That on and prior to February 2, 1903, one McMaster was the owner of the land in question and that on said day plaintiff and MeMaster entered into a lease whereby the latter leased the said land to plaintiff for the term of five years from November 1, 1904, “for hunting purposes only”; that plaintiff entered into possession of said land on November 1, 1904, and still is in possession, “and has, under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jerome v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kellogg v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Moore v. HallidayOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Fabian v. CollinsMontana Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Helms Bakeries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kibbin v. McFaddinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Tristam v. MarquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cammers v. Marion CablevisionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Olpp v. Hocking Valley Railway Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.