People v. Fleming
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s sole claim of error — that the trial court violated his right of confrontation by permitting the arresting officer to testify that he arrested defendant after a conversation with an individual who did not testify — has not been preserved for our review. Although defense counsel sought a prospective ruling on this point, the court declined to make an anticipatory ruling. When the arresting officer later testified at trial, counsel entered objections as "objection” or "leading”, but failed to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by81 opinions
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. TevahaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Whitley v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.