Legal Opinion

People v. Tevaha

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1994PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole claim of error — that he was denied a fair

trial when the court permitted testimony by the arresting officer regarding the general practices of drug sellers — has not been preserved for our review. Defense counsel simply made a general objection when the testimony was proffered, and failed to advise the trial court that the present claimed error was the basis for his objection. The word "objection” alone was insufficient to preserve the issue for our review (see, People v Fleming, 70 NY2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. FlemingNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. People v. TongeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. MalaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. HoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. CapersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API