Legal Opinion

People v. Sprowal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1994PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

On this appeal we revisit the subject of a criminal defendant’s right to be present during sidebar discussions with prospective jurors.

Defendant was tried in May 1989 for sale of cocaine to an undercover officer. During voir dire, three prospective jurors stated in sidebars with the court that they might know the defendant, his family or the location of the crime. Several other venirepersons indicated general bias or personal obstacles that prevented them from offering jury service. Each was excused. Although the prosecutor and defense counsel participated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. MaherNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. JupiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API