People v. West
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that reversible error occurred when the trial court permitted two witnesses to bolster the victim’s prior identification of the defendant. (See People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471.) Although a general protest was raised against this testimony, defendant at no time objected to this testimony on the specific ground that it constituted improper bolstering. Thus, defendant has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. (See People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 720, 722; see, also, People v Vidal,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. VidalNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by121 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. TevahaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. FlemingNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MosleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.