Legal Opinion
Burke v. Mesta Mach. Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 15, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 2744PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought by or in behalf of a group of employees of the defendant company, under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), to recover alleged unpaid overtime compensation and an addi-; tional equal amount as liquidated damages plus counsel fees and costs.
The plaintiffs sue in behalf of themselves and of others similarly situated who have executed written warrants of authority to the plaintiffs, as a result of which there are *136451 individual plaintiffs whose claims exist for adjudication.
It has been stipulated and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Sbicca-Del Mac, Inc. v. Milius Shoe Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
- Wagner v. American Service Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Stewart v. Arrington Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Wilkerson v. ButlerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.