Legal Opinion
Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 3, 1940PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Three motions were made herein and submitted together. (A) Defendant United Artists moved, in the alternative, that the plaintiffs be required to separately state and number three alleged causes of action, or, that certain specified matter be stricken from the complaint, or for a bill of particulars in respect to certain enumerated paragraphs of the complaint. (B) Defendants London Film and Alexander Korda moved for a dismissal of the complaint as to them. (C) The plaintiffs ■ moved, before issue joined, pursuant to Rule 26(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Brinley v. LewisDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Tully v. HowardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CJ Tagliabue Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Benevento v. A. & P. Food Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Estate of Jephson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- James Jonathan Mapp v. The Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, James Jonathan Mapp, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees v. The Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.