Legal Opinion
Mack v. LaValley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 1999No. AC 18196PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendants, Bernard LaValley and Pauline LaValley, appeal from the judgment of the trial *152court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Lillian Mack, in this premises liability action. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) admitted into evidence deposition testimony of a plaintiffs witness and failed to redact the witness’ opinion testimony contained in that deposition, (2) denied the defendants’ motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and (3) failed to reduce the economic damages award by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. DebarrosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Rowe v. GouletConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Lunn v. Cummings & LockwoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. MillsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.