Legal Opinion
C & J Builders & Remodelers, LLC v. Geisenheimer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 1999No. SC 16004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*416 Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
General Statutes § 52-410 (a) provides in relevant part that “[a] party to a written agreement for arbitration claiming the neglect or refusal of another to proceed with an arbitration thereunder may make application to the superior court . . . for an order directing the parties to proceed with the arbitration in compliance with their agreement. ...” The issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, C & J Builders and Remodelers, LLC, is a party to an arbitration agreement with the defendants, Emile J. Geisenheimer and Susan Geisenheimer, and, therefore, properly may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Kaddah v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Prancing Antelope I, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company Chris Shannon and Cynthia G. Bloomquist v. Saratoga Inn Overlook Homeowners Association, Inc., a Wyoming nonprofit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Bank of America, N.A. v. BarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Medina v. Unlimited Systems, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.