Legal Opinion
Bouchard v. People's Bank
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 9, 1991No. 14213PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Frederick L. Bouchard, pleaded sufficient facts in his complaint to state a cause of action against the defendant, People’s Bank, as the assignee of certain choses in action under General Statutes § 52-118.1 See Practice Book § 190.2 We conclude that the plain*467tiffs complaint was legally sufficient, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the Superior Court that was rendered following the granting of the defendant’s motion to strike the complaint.
In reviewing the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s complaint, we assume the truth of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Michaud v. WawruckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Total Waste Management Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.