Legal Opinion
Bank of America, N.A. v. Barr
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 30, 2010No. Docket: Cum-10-173PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Constance H. Barr appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.) following a non-jury trial in which Banwas found to be personally liable for debt incurred on a small business line of credit. Barr ar gues that the court erred in admitting certain documents into evidence pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule, M.R. Evid. 803(6), and that the evidence was insufficient to support several findings key to the court’s judgment. 1 We affirm the judgment.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶2] The record, including Barr’s admissions presented at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Sullivan v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Coastal Ventures v. Alsham Plaza, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Carlson v. Doekson Gross, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Ladd v. Scudder Kemper Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beneficial Maine Inc. v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- State of Maine v. Andrew J. LegassieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. Roda O. Abdi State of Maine v. Ali-Nassir H. AhmedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.