Legal Opinion

United States v. Spears

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 11, 1994No. ACM 30482PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PEARSON, Judge:

This is an appeal from multiple drug convictions under Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a(a), involving “ecstasy,” a Schedule I controlled substance. The approved sentence consists of a bad-conduct discharge, 9 months confinement, 9 months partial forfeiture of pay, and reduction to E-l.

Appellant contends the military judge erred in not sua sponte determining specification 2, alleging introduction of ecstasy onto Ramstein Air Base (AB) with the intent to distribute on May 23,1992, was multiplicious for findings with specification…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. CauseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. ZupancicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. StrachanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. WaitsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. PagelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. LloydUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API