Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Lloyd

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 24, 1995No. ACM 30846PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PEARSON, Senior Judge:

In this case, we announce a new bright line rule concerning forfeiture of multiplicity issues — they are forfeited unless raised at trial.

In accordance with a pretrial agreement limiting his sentence, appellant pled guilty before a general court-martial to sexually abusing his two stepdaughters, CW then aged 15, and SW then aged 17. Court members sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, 15 years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-l. The convening authority reduced the forfeiture to $450 per month for 180 months to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. RuppelUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. DolbowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API