Legal Opinion
Krieger v. Gast
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 18, 2000No. 4:99-cv-00086PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
The Court has before it the parties’ briefs regarding certain legal issues which the parties characterize as both “disputed” and “controlling.” The Court ordered the parties to brief these issues after receiving a joint request from the parties to rule on them. Although the briefs are not submitted in support of any particular motion, the Court believes it appropriate to address the issues as if presented on cross motions for partial summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Facts 1
A fairly exhaustive statement of facts is set forth in the Court’s prior Opinion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Skeen v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McMinn v. MBF Operating Acquisition Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- McMinn v. MBF Operating, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Krieger v. GastDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- in Re Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Shareholder LitigationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- in Re Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Shareholder LitigationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017