Krieger v. Gast
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
QUIST, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Facts. 766
II. Procedural History. 769
III. Motion Standard . 770
IV. Discussion. 770
A. Was There A Plan?. 770
B. Does Michigan Law Permit An “Entire Fairness” Challenge To A Freeze-Out Merger?. 774
C. Did Defendants Breach Their Fiduciary Duties To Krieger And The Class? . 778
1. Misrepresentations. 779
a. The Terms on Which the Continuing Shareholders Would Sell Most of Their Stock to Gast. 779
b. The $140 Per Share Price to be Paid by RDY Aria. 780
2. Omissions . 781
a. The “Plan” . 781
b. Financial Statements. 781
c. The Lack of a Fairness…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Antioch Litigation Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010