Legal Opinion

Krieger v. Gast

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 9, 2001No. 1:99-cr-00086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

QUIST, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Facts. 766

II. Procedural History. 769

III. Motion Standard . 770

IV. Discussion. 770

A. Was There A Plan?. 770

B. Does Michigan Law Permit An “Entire Fairness” Challenge To A Freeze-Out Merger?. 774

C. Did Defendants Breach Their Fiduciary Duties To Krieger And The Class? . 778

1. Misrepresentations. 779

a. The Terms on Which the Continuing Shareholders Would Sell Most of Their Stock to Gast. 779

b. The $140 Per Share Price to be Paid by RDY Aria. 780

2. Omissions . 781

a. The “Plan” . 781

b. Financial Statements. 781

c. The Lack of a Fairness…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Antioch Litigation Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API