Legal Opinion

Skeen v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 3, 2000No. 448, 1999PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider the adequacy of corporate disclosures to minority stockholders who were “cashed out” in a merger approved by the majority stockholder. The minority stockholders complain that they were not given enough financial information to decide whether to accept the merger consideration or seek appraisal. They say, in essence, that the settled law governing disclosure requirements for mergers does not apply, and that far more valuation data must be disclosed where, as here, the merger decision has been made and the only decision for the minority is whether to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Stroud v. GraceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Loudon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. McMullin v. BeranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. In re Pure Resources, Inc., Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  4. In re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  5. In Re Oracle Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API