Legal Opinion

McMinn v. MBF Operating Acquisition Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. 29,725PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} Plaintiff Rory A. McMinn (“McMinn”) was a non-controlling shareholder in a closely-held corporation whose interest in the corporation was eliminated by the controlling shareholders through the use of a “freeze out” merger transaction. That transaction involved two steps. First, the controlling shareholders formed a “shell” corporation, an entity set up for the sole purpose of merging with the existing corporation, of which they were the sole directors. Second, the controlling shareholders caused the shell corporation to merge with the existing corporation, with one…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Peters Corp. v. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. TorrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sound Infiniti, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Gutierrez v. Meteor MonumentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API