Legal Opinion
Krasowski v. Fantarella
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 8, 1998No. AC 17625PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendants, Louis Fantarella, Jr., Laura Fantarella and Louis Fantarella, Sr.,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered against them in an action to quiet and settle title. Pursuant to General Statutes § 47-30,2 the plaintiffs, Walter J. Krasowski and *188Genevieve Krasowski, elected to have the trial court confirm the title of the disputed property in the defendants and to have the defendants pay an equitable sum as determined by the trial court. The defendants challenge the trial court’s determination of the value of the disputed property and dispute the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Young v. VlahosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Marquardt & Roche/Meditz & Hackett, Inc. v. Riverbend Executive Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola'sConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Superior Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.