Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Lyman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1926No. 1717PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

This is a motion to dismiss a writ of error or to affirm the judgment of the court below. The motion to dismiss the writ is predicated on certain alleged imperfections in the application for its issuance and the legal insufficiency of the bond filed by the plaintiff in error. Since the motion was argued and submitted the plaintiff in error has by amendment cured the imperfections complained of and has also filed a new bond the sufficiency of which is not questioned by the movant. The motion to dismiss the writ is therefore overruled. This leaves for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Queen v. Ah KiaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Waldeyer v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Coney v. MitamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McBryde Estate Ltd. v. GayHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kane v. NakalekaHawaii Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sapp v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cuerva & Associates v. WongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Sanders v. Point After, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Territory v. Van DaldenHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ling v. YokoyamaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API