Legal Opinion

Territory v. Van Dalden

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1934No. Nos. 2136, 2137 AND 2138PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

The three felony cases above entitled were by agreement consolidated for trial and were tried together in the circuit court resulting in the conviction of the defendant of the crime charged in each indictment. The trial was by the court without a jury in circumstances hereinafter set forth. Each case is before us upon writ of error. In this court the three were argued and submitted together. The assignments of error, nineteen in number, are the same in eaeh case. Each assignment sets forth an alleged error in the court’s order denying defendant’s motion for a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Reed v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Carrion v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Derber v. SkaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pueblo v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  5. State v. OliveraHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API