Legal Opinion

Coney v. Mitamura

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions from Ciacurr Court, Fifth Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

JUDD, C.J.

This is an action of assumpsit on a negotiable promissory note in words and figures as follows:

“Kilauea, Kauai, H. I.,

Oct. 1st, 1892.

Six months after date I promise to pay to H. P. Hugus, or order, Two Hundred Dollars ($200) without defalcation for value received.

With interest at 8 per cent.'from date.

T. Mitamura.”

On the back of the note there are the following indorsements:

“Pay to order of Dr. St. D. G-. Walters,

IT. P. Hugus.

Pay to order of J. TI. Ooney.

St. D. Gunlais Walters.”

The case was tried before the District Magistrate of the District of Hanalei,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  2. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ito v. BarilottiHawaii Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API