Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Point After, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1981No. 6725PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, C.J.

Appeal is taken from a jury verdict adverse to the appellant in a bifurcated personal injury action against the Point After, Inc., discotheque and two of its employees. Appellant Ronald Edger Sanders (Sanders) cites five errors allegedly committed by the trial court that warrant reversal of the verdict: (1) whether the court erred in denying appellant’s motion for continuance and setting the matter for trial on the sole question of liability, reserving the question of damages for a later trial; (2) whether the court erred in barring admission of two of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener, as of the Estate of Norton Wiener, Deceased, and Related CasesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Susie Parker Nettles and Alvie C. Nettles v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Limited and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Moss v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Pickering v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. James Hosie v. Chicago and North Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Johnson v. Robert's Hawaii Tour, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kam Fui Trust Ex Rel. Commercial Management Corp. v. BrandhorstHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ling v. YokoyamaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Alt v. KruegerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API