Legal Opinion

Kane v. Nakaleka

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions from Decision of Bickerton, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Preston, J.

This is an action for Criminal Conversation and was tried at the last October Term, before Mr. Justice Bickerton and a Hawaiian Jury, when a verdict was returned for the plaintiff with $112.50 damages.

*212The complaint alleges the adultery to have been committed in or about the month of January, 1886, and a second count alleges that the defendant on the 2d day of March, 1886, enticed the plaintiff’s wife from her home and that “ he has ever since detained and harbored her and lived in adultery with her.”

The complaint was filed on the 15th July, 1887.

The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Territory v. Van DaldenHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Irwin v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API