Legal Opinion

Thirlby v. Rainbow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to Kalkaska. (Aldrich, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Plaintiffs contracted to sell to James Greacen a 3-saw gang edger, for the sum of $225, payable $112.50 down, and the balance in two, six, and nine months.1 Greacen gave interest-bearing notes for the deferred payments, and the edger was delivered into his possession, under the following agreement:

“It is also hereby agreed that the above-specified machinery shall remain the property of Thirlby, Jackson & Go., and the machine be subject to their order, until all the purchase price is paid, whether it rest in account or be evidenced by promissory notes or otherwise; but in default or failure to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Johnston v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Marquette Manufacturing Co. v. JefferyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. LozoMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Couse v. TregentMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McCargar v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Cudahy Bros. v. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API