Legal Opinion

Brittell v. Department of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 22, 1998No. SC 15829PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Brittell, formerly a correction officer employed by the named defendant, the department of correction,1 brought this damages action claiming that the defendant: (1) failed to take proper steps to remedy a sexually hostile working environment in violation of the Fair Employment Practices Act, General Statutes § 46a-51 et seq.; and (2) constructively discharged her from her employment as a correction officer. The trial court, Barnett, J., rejected the plaintiffs claims and rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Bentley v. AutoZoners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  4. Patino v. Birken Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API