Legal Opinion
Blair v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided January 2, 1931No. 168—DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
This is a suit brought under section 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 TTSCA § 16) to recover certain sums aggregating $4,-429.44, with interest, alleged to be due from defendants to plaintiffs in pursuance of an award in the latter’s favor in a proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of said section provide that, after hearing upon complaint made as provided by section 13 (49 IJSCA § 13), the Commission, if it determines that any party is entitled to an award of damages under the provisions of the act, shall make, an order'…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State National Bank v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Pittsburgh & W. v. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
- Watson v. National Life & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware &. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. BermanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
- Farris v. Meyer Schuman Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Smith Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Black United Front v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.