Legal Opinion

Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. Berman

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 6, 1934No. 823 APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This action is brought under section 7 (b) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (title 7 USCA § 557 (b) to enforce a liability determined by the Secretary of Agriculture under subdivision (a) of said section. Plaintiff offered in evidence the proceedings, findings, conclusions, and orders of the Secretary as making out a prima facie case under the statute.

The following findings of fact were made by the Secretary:

1. That the complainant is a corporation under the laws of Arizona, having its main office at Phoenix, Ariz.;

2. That respondent is an individual and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. New River Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1933
  5. Blair v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Consolidated Citrus Company v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API