Legal Opinion
Farris v. Meyer Schuman Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 22, 1940No. 7371PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to Sections 2(2) and 5 (a, b) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 46 Stat. 532, 534, Title 7 U.S. C.A. §§ 499b(2), 499e(a) and (b), Barbere Farris and Fred Farris, purchasers, made complaint to the Secretary of Agriculture against the Meyer Schuman Company, seller, charging that on July 9, 1938 the seller sold to the purchasers a carload of cantaloupes, U. S. No. 1 grade, then in transit in interstate commerce; that the purchasers had been advised by the seller that the cantaloupes were in good condition when shipped; that the merchandise did not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Cuneo Press v. Claybourn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Blair v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HappCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- F.C. Bloxom Company v. Tom Lange Company International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Etty v. Federal Consulting Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- In Re Louisiana Investment and Loan CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Nixon v. Life Insurance Company of VirginiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.