Legal Opinion
Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware &. Hudson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 17, 1933No. 173PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The present suit, brought under section 16(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USCA § 16 (2), seeks to recover from three defendant railroad corporations damages suffered by the petitioner, hereafter referred to as the eement company, by reason of the collection from it of unreasonable and unlawful freight rates on shipments of cement during the two years preceding August 27, 1926. The eement company manufactured its product at Glens Falls, N. Y., and sliipped it by railroad to various destinations in New England. Its shipments moved from Glens Falls to Sidney, N. Y.,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. Excelsior Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- New Process Gear Corporation v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Meyers v. Famous Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Meyers v. Famous Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.