Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh & W. v. Ry. Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1924No. 945PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoolley, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Seven coal operators located on the line of the Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company in Pennsylvania and West Virginia severally instituted proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission seeking reparation for damages which they had sustained, as they alleged, through that company’s preferential practices in the distribution of empty coal cars, for use in interstate commerce, during two periods, one prior to the taking over of the railroads by the government and the other subsequent thereto.
The mines alleged to have been favored are those of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Brady v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1930
- Public Service Traffic Bureau, Inc. v. Haworth Marble Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.