Legal Opinion

Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1938No. Patent Appeal 3915PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents sustaining an opposition filed by appellee to prevent the registration, under the Trade-mark Act of February 20, 1905, of appellant’s mark “Starlash,” applied to eyelash and eyebrow mascara, for which registration he filed application on January 28, 1935.

Appellee on May 1, 1935, filed notice of opposition to the registration of appellant’s mark, and alleged therein: Prior use, ownership, and registration of the trademark “Kurlash,” applied to “eyelash curlers,” and the trade-mark “Kurlash Tweezette,” for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kotex Co. v. McArthurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Yeasties Products, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Maddock's Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Fashion Park, Inc. v. FairCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gamlen Chemical Co. v. GamlenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Hat Corporation of America v. John B. Stetson CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Burton-Dixie Corporation v. Restonic CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API