Legal Opinion

Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, dismissing appellant’s notice of opposition, and adjudging that the appellee was entitled to the registration of its trade-mark, the appellant has appealed to this court.

The opposer, appellant, based its opposition upon the use, by it and its predecessors, of its registered trade-mark “Oxydol,” since June 10, 1914, as a trade-mark on soap powder.

The applicant, appellee, seeks to register “Oxol,” which is used as a trade-mark on a liquid chlorine soliltion, intended…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  4. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. Capewell Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API