Legal Opinion

Kotex Co. v. McArthur

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2527PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal, in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition of appellant and adjudging appellee entitled to the registration of the trade-mark “Rotex” for use on vaginal syringes.

Appellant’s trade-mark consists of the word “Kotex.” It was registered on September 21, 1920, and has been continuously and extensively used by appellant and its predecessor since the year 1919, as a trade-mark on catamenial bandages—sanitary napkins.

It appears…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Cheek-Neal Coffee Co. v. Hal Dick Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. HartogensisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California v. American Grocer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Bon Ami Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Lever Bros. Co. v. Sitroux Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. Revere Sugar Refinery v. SalvatoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API