Legal Opinion

Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Maddock's Sons Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 27, 1930No. 2183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the examiner of interferences dismissing the opposition and holding that the applicant was entitled to have its trade-mark registered.

*786Appellee’s application was filed on December 19, 1925, for the-registration of its trade-mark “Durock” for use on “lavatories, drinking fountains, bidets, water-closets, water-closet tanks, robe-bangers, towel holders, toilet-paper holders, shower heads, brackets,, shelves, glass holders, sponge holders, comb and brush holders,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. In Re Dutch Maid Ice Cream Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  4. Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API