Legal Opinion
L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 25, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6123PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, 99 U.S.P.Q. 342, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences which sustained appellant’s notice of opposition to the registration by appellee, under the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S. C.A. § 1051 et seq., of the notation “Clime-matic” as a trade-mark for air conditioning units.
Appellee alleged May 12, 1949 as the date of first use of the involved mark in commerce among the several states. The application was examined and passed for publication pursuant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Burmel Handkerchief Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Nestle's Milk Products, Inc. v. Baker Importing Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- North Star Mfg. Co. v. Wells Lamont Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- J. R. Wood and Sons, Inc. v. Reese Jewelry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Armour and Company v. Organon, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.