Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. Tal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.;
1 The question presented is one of first impression. Does an order of this Court assuming original jurisdiction, but denying mandamus relief as it relates to a pending controversy between the parties, bar review on direct appeal of the same claims made in the course of the mandamus proceedings? We hold that the summary denial of the writ should not be given preclusive effect in proceedings on direct appeal.
FACTS
2 Only the following facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. 1 The appellee, Miller Dollarhide, P.C. (Miller Dollarhide/law firm) and the appellant, Moshe Tal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. TalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 v. STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.