Legal Opinion
Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. Tal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 2007No. 100,179PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
T1 The questions presented are whether: 1) a trial judge's continued participation in a cause while motions for disqualification are pending deprive the movant of a fundamental right to due process; and 2) the trial judge abused his discretion when he declined to disqualify. We hold that: 1) a trial judge's continued participation while motions to disqualify are pending results in a deprivation of due process; and 2) the refusal to disqualify was an abuse of discretion.
FACTS
T2 The facts surrounding the genesis of this action are discussed in Miller Dollarhide, P.C., v. Moshe Tal, 2006 OK 27,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Clark v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. TalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- KRUG v. HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Adewale Eniola Tawose v. Matthew L. Winton, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Arbuckle Simpson Aquifer Protection Federation of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- IN RE: AMENDMENT OF RULE 15 FOR DISTRICT COURTS OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.