Legal Opinion
STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 10, 2014No. 111985PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
T1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the appellee, the State of Oklahoma represented by the Attorney General of Oklahoma (AG), was entitled to summary judgment in the amount of $47,767,795.20, as a matter of law. In deciding the propriety of summary judgment, we must address two underlying questions: 1) whether the district court, on remand, was bound by the facts supporting our holdings in the earlier appeal, State ex rel. Edmondson v. Native Wholesale Supply, 2010 OK 58, 237 P.3d 199 (cert. denied, Native Wholesale Supply v. State of Okla., -- U.S. --, 181 S.Ct. 2150, 179…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Montgomery v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- STEVENS v. FOXSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.