Legal Opinion
L. Suzio Concrete Co. v. Salafia
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 19, 1985No. 2123; 2124PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
In each of these cases, the plaintiff is appealing1 from the trial court’s decision to dissolve an ex parte prejudgment remedy. The issues presented in each appeal are identical.
The plaintiffs initially brought suit against a corporation, Mike Salafia Builders, Inc., as well as Mike Salafia, individually, for payment for materials and services which they claimed to have furnished the defendants. The plaintiffs withdrew the actions as to the corporation and proceeded only against Mike Salafia, also known as Sebastian J. Salafia. Each plaintiff obtained a postcomplaint prejudgment remedy of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haxhi v. MossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Pero Building Co. v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Goodwin v. PrattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Anderson v. NedovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.