Legal Opinion
Pero Building Co. v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 1986No. 3508PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendants, Donald H. Smith1 and Leila Smith, are appealing from a judgment of the trial court denying their application for discharge of two mechanics’ liens.2
The plaintiff, Pero Building Company, Inc., brought an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien it had filed when the defendants Donald H. Smith and Leila Smith failed to remit the balance of the payments due under a contract with the plaintiff for the construction of a two family house on property which they owned. The Smiths answered and filed a counterclaim alleging that the plaintiff had performed the contract negligently, had…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Capp Industries, Inc. v. SchoenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- First Union National Bank v. RPB 2, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Duracell International Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987
- De Leonardis v. Subway Sandwich Shops, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.