Legal Opinion
Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 17, 1985No. 2987PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc., from an order granting the plaintiffs a prejudgment remedy in an amount which included past and future damages.
The plaintiffs, all of whom are engaged in the business of servicing, maintaining and repairing automobile transmissions, brought this action against the defendant Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc., which supplied them with defective automatic transmission fluid, and the defendant Atlantic Coast Oil Company, which supplied the product to Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.1 The plaintiffs purchased approximately 2200 gallons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WatermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- People's Bank v. Bilmor Building Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. CrumbleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- BERGESEN Dy A/S v. LindholmDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.