Legal Opinion

Haxhi v. Moss

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 11, 1991No. 8821PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The plaintiffs in this libel action, Patty and Ben Haxhi, doing business as Patty’s Pantry, appeal from the granting of the defendant’s motion to dissolve or modify an ex parte prejudgment attachment. The plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s finding that there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause that the defendant had acted with malice in fact. The defendant has cross appealed, claiming that the trial court improperly determined that her challenged statement (1) was not protected by the constitutional guarantee of free speech and (2) accused the plaintiffs of dealing drugs.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Hassett v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Giordano v. GiordanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Tyler v. SchnabelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. People's Bank v. Bilmor Building Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Roberts v. Triplanet Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  5. Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API