Legal Opinion
Mazinski v. Dight
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 2, 1951No. Civ. A. 8342PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This matter relates to defendant’s motion for a change of venue from the Western District of Pennsylvania to the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a).
It is an action based on negligence.
The claims arise out of a two-car collision on June 15, 1949, in the State of Tennessee. Ernest Mazinski, the driver of one car, was killed. The plaintiff, Lily Eva Mazinski, sues as his widow on behalf of herself and minor son under the death statutes of Tennessee. Lily Eva Mazinski and Adele Blau also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williams v. Green Bay & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Naughton v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Keller-Dorian Colorfilm Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Fletcher v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Brown v. WoodringDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Jurgelis v. Southern Motors Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. GinsburgDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.